• SELECTED PROJECTS
  • NEWS
  • NOTES
  • CV
  • CONTACT

Cody Trepte

  • SELECTED PROJECTS
  • NEWS
  • NOTES
  • CV
  • CONTACT
Animals in Moiré by Andrea Minini

Animals in Moiré by Andrea Minini

Thursday 04.24.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
From the University of Chicago Library (via Language Log):
Calling all historians of cryptography and stenography, Sherlockians (see “The Dancing Men”), and other amateur detectives!  The collection of Homer editions in the Special Collections Resea…

From the University of Chicago Library (via Language Log):

Calling all historians of cryptography and stenography, Sherlockians (see “The Dancing Men”), and other amateur detectives!  The collection of Homer editions in the Special Collections Research Center – the  Bibliotheca Homerica Langiana(BHL) – includes a copy of the rare 1504 edition of Homer’s Odyssey that contains, in Book 11 (narrating Odysseus’s journey into Hades) handwritten annotations in a strange and as-yet unidentified script.  This marginalia appearsonly in the pages of Book 11 of the Odyssey; nowhere else in the volume.  Although the donor of the BHL is suspicious that this odd script is a form of 19th-century shorthand (likely French), he acknowledges that this hypothesis remains unsupported by any evidence offered to date.

The donor of the BHL is offering a prize of $1,000 to the first person who identifies the script, provides evidence to support the conclusion, and executes a translation of selected portions of the mysterious marginalia.  In addition to the photographs in this post, the volume is available to consult in person in the Special Collections reading room.  Please visit the Special Collections website for information about requesting items to get started. The contest is open to all, regardless of University of Chicago affiliation. Please direct submissions to the contest, or questions, to Alice Schreyer, Assistant University Librarian, Humanities and Social Sciences and Rare Books Curator, orCatherine Uecker, Rare Books Librarian.

Thursday 04.24.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Fay Nicolson, Untitled (form series ‘Marginal Notes’), 2012

Fay Nicolson, Untitled (form series ‘Marginal Notes’), 2012

Sunday 04.20.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Lutz Bacher “this / that,” 1977

Lutz Bacher “this / that,” 1977

Sunday 04.20.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Christopher Wool

Christopher Wool

Sunday 04.20.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Computer Chess

Computer Chess

Tuesday 04.15.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Trajal Harrell: Antigone Sr./Twenty Looks or Paris is Burning at the Judson Church (L)

Trajal Harrell: Antigone Sr./Twenty Looks or Paris is Burning at the Judson Church (L)

Sunday 04.06.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
tumblr_n36arbSbJT1qbgkzxo1_1280.jpg
Friday 03.28.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
H. Armstrong Roberts Magician Hands Pulling Rabbit Out Of Top Hat, 1935

H. Armstrong Roberts
Magician Hands Pulling Rabbit Out Of Top Hat, 1935

Friday 03.28.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
“Music and literature were deeply important to Kolmogorov, who believed he could analyze them probabilistically to gain insight into the inner workings of the human mind. He was a cultural elitist who believed in a hierarchy of artistic values. At the pinnacle were the writings of Goethe, Pushkin, and Thomas Mann, alongside the compositions of Bach, Vivaldi, Mozart, and Beethoven—works whose enduring value resembled eternal mathematical truths. Kolmogorov stressed that every true work of art was a unique creation, something unlikely by definition, something outside the realm of simple statistical regularity. “Is it possible to include [Tolstoy’s War and Peace] in a reasonable way into the set of ‘all possible novels’ and further to postulate the existence of a certain probability distribution in this set?” he asked, sarcastically, in a 1965 article.”
— The Man Who Invented Modern Probability by Dr. Slava Gerovitch
nautil.us
Thursday 03.27.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Josef Strau Installation view of My Divid'ed House at Vilma Gold

Josef Strau
Installation view of My Divid'ed House at Vilma Gold

Thursday 03.27.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
“

0= 1-1



What might it represent? That 1 and -1 add up to zero, of course.



But that is interesting. Picture the reverse of the process: not 1 and -1 coming together to make 0, but 0 peeling apart, as it were, into 1 and -1. Where once you had Nothing, now you have two Somethings! Opposites of some kind, evidently. Positive and negative energy. Matter and antimatter. Yin and yang.



Even more suggestively, -1 might be thought of as the same entity as 1, only moving backward in time. This is the interpretation seized on by the Oxford chemist (and outspoken atheist) Peter Atkins. “Opposites,” he writes, “are distinguished by their direction of travel in time.” In the absence of time, -1 and 1 cancel; they coalesce into zero. Time allows the two opposites to peel apart-and it is this peeling apart that, in turn, marks the emergence of time. It was thus, Atkins proposes, that the spontaneous creation of the universe got under way.

”
— Jim Holt - Why Does The World Exist
Thursday 03.27.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Sreshta Rit Premnath
Toners, Dyes, 2011
acrylic paint and inkjet print on mirrored mylar, 5 parts, each 213 x 61 cm

Sreshta Rit Premnath
Toners, Dyes, 2011
acrylic paint and inkjet print on mirrored mylar, 5 parts, each 213 x 61 cm

Tuesday 03.11.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
“

On one hand, I got seduced by it at an early age because it’s so elegant, this infinite hierarchy of infinites. On the other hand, I think that it’s not real in the sense that I don’t think that there’s anything truly infinite in our physical world.



Moreover, assuming the infinite has caused many of the worst problems in physics right now. One of the biggest problems we have in cosmology is called the measure problem, which prevents us from predicting anything rigorously. It comes from the assumption that space can be stretched out ad infinitum. Space is truly continuous. If that were really true, to even measure the distance between two points, you would need to write out a real number like 5.732… with infinitely many decimals, yet we’ve never measured any number better than 17 decimals. That’s a pretty far cry from infinity!



Most of the stuff I teach at MIT which assumes infinity we even know is wrong. When I calculate why it is that you can hear me by using the equation for sound waves, it assumes that air is continuous, that at infinitely many points in the air there is this pressure you can measure there. But we know it’s wrong because air is made of atoms. It’s much more convenient to make that continuum approximation than to deal with all those pesky atoms.



My guess is that we will ultimately discover some other mathematical description of the Universe which is infinity-free and find that all this infinite math that we’re using today is just a really convenient approximation.

”
— Max Tegmark on infinity
Wednesday 01.29.14
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Shannon Ebner

Shannon Ebner

Saturday 10.26.13
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
“Naturalness is a temporal illusion: like seasons, things seem static because we don’t notice them changing, and when they do change, there is a rough predictability to the way they do so. Horror and disgust arise whenever that neat aesthetic frame breaks.”
— Timothy Morton
Monday 10.07.13
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
“Because language is an arbitrary system of negative difference, there is no sign that stands somehow outside the system to guarantee the meaning and stability of the other signs. This means language is infinite, in the strong sense that we can never fully account for its meanings or effects. It also means that meaning depends upon meaninglessness. And that language as a system is not a thing, not an object, but a strange infinite network without inside or outside. The process that makes signs manifest as appearance and meaning is différance: the process of difference (synchronic) and deferment (diachronic). The meaning of a word is another word, and strings of signs only gain significance retroactively. The meaning of a sentence is a moving target. You will never be able to know exactly when the end of this sentence is until after you’ve read it elephant.”
— Timothy Morton
Wednesday 10.02.13
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Jimmy Robert

Jimmy Robert

Monday 09.30.13
Posted by Cody Trepte
 

Falling or Jumping, 2011 by Ruth Proctor

Wednesday 09.25.13
Posted by Cody Trepte
 

déjà vu

Two quoted anecdotes, written originally in Borges’ 1928 “Language of the Argentines”, appearing here from “A History of Eternity” (1936) translated by Esther Allen and “A New Refutation of Time” (1944-47) translated by Suzanne Jill Levine.

—-
I wish to record an experience I had a few nights ago: a triviality too evanescent and ecstatic to be called an adventure, too irrational and sentimental for thought. It was a scene and its word: a word I had spoken but had not fully lived with all my being until then. I will recount its history and the accidents of time and place that revealed it to me.

I remember it thus: On the afternoon before that night, I was in Barracas, an area I do not customarily visit, and whose distance from the places I later passed through had already given the day a strange savor. The night had no objective whatsoever; the weather was clear, and so, after dinner, I went out to walk and remember. I did not want to establish any particular direction for my stroll: I strove for a maximum latitude of possibility so as not to fatigue my expectant mind with the obligatory foresight of a particular path. I accomplished, to the unsatisfactory degree to which it is possible, what is called strolling at random, without other conscious resolve than to pass up the avenues and broad streets in favor of chance’s more obscure invitations. Yet a kind of familiar gravitation pushed me toward neighborhoods whose name I wish always to remember, places that fill my heart with reverence. I am not alluding to my own neighborhood, the precise circumference of my childhood, but to its still mysterious outskirts; a frontier region I have possessed fully in words and very little in reality, at once adjacent and mythical. These penultimate streets are, for me, the opposite of what is familiar, its other face, almost as unknown as the buried foundations of our house or our own invisible skeleton. The walk left me at a street corner. I took in the night, in perfect, serene respite from thought. The vision before me, not at all complex to begin with, seemed further simplified by my fatigue. Its very ordinariness made it unreal. It was a street of one-story houses, and though its first meaning was poverty, its second was certainly bliss. It was the poorest and most beautiful thing. The houses faced away from the street; a fig tree merged into shadow over the blunted street corner, and the narrow portals—higher than the extending lines of the walls—seemed wrought of the same infinite substance as the night. The sidewalk was embanked above a street of elemental dirt, the dirt of a still unconquered America. In the distance, the road, by then a country lane, crumbled into the Maldonado River. Against the muddy, chaotic earth, a low, rose-colored wall seemed not to harbor the moonlight but to shimmer with a gleam all its own. Tenderness could have no better name than that rose color.

I stood there looking at this simplicity. I thought, undoubtedly aloud: “This is the same as it was thirty years ago.” I imagined that date: recent enough in other countries, but already remote on this everchanging side of the world. Perhaps a bird was singing and I felt for it a small, bird-sized fondness; but there was probably no other sound in the dizzying silence except for the equally timeless noise of crickets. The glib thought I am in the year eighteen hundred and something ceased to be a few approximate words and deepened into reality. I felt as the dead feel, I felt myself to be an abstract observer of the world: an indefinite fear imbued with knowledge that is the greatest clarity of metaphysics. No, I did not believe I had made my way upstream on the presumptive waters of Time. Rather, I suspected myself to be in possession of the reticent or absent meaning of the inconceivable word eternity. Only later did I succeed in defining this figment of my imagination.

I write it out now: This pure representation of homogenous facts—the serenity of the night, the translucent little wall, the small-town scent of honeysuckle, the fundamental dirt—is not merely identical to what existed on that corner many years ago; it is, without superficial resemblances or repetitions, the same. When we can feel this oneness, time is a delusion which the indifference and inseparability of a moment from its apparent yesterday and from its apparent today suffice to disintegrate.

The number of such human moments is clearly not infinite. The elemental experiences—physical suffering and physical pleasure, falling asleep, listening to a piece of music, feeling great intensity or great apathy—are even more impersonal. I derive, in advance, this conclusion: life is too impoverished not to be immortal. But we lack even the certainty of our own poverty, given that time, which is easily refutable by the senses, is not so easily refuted by the intellect, from whose essence the concept of succession appears inseparable. Let there remain, then, the glimpse of an idea in an emotional anecdote, and, in the acknowledged irresolution of this page, the true moment of ecstasy and the possible intimation of eternity which that night did not hoard from me.

—-
I wish to record here an experience I had some nights ago, a trifling matter too evanescent and ecstatic to be called an adventure, too irrational and sentimental to be called a thought. I am speaking of a scene and its word, a word I had said before but had not lived with total involvement until that night. I shall describe it now, with the incidents of time and place that happened to reveal it. This is how I remember it: I had spent the afternoon in Barracas, a place I rarely visited, a place whose distance from the scene of my later wanderings lent a strange aura to that day. As I had nothing to do that night and the weather was fair, I went out after dinner to walk and remember. I had no wish to have a set destination; I followed a random course, as much as possible; I accepted, with no conscious anticipation other than avoiding the avenues or wide streets, the most obscure invitations of chance. A kind of familiar gravitation, however, drew me toward places whose name I shall always remember, for they arouse in me a certain reverence. I am not speaking of the specific surroundings of my childhood, my own neighborhood, but of its still mysterious borders, which I have possessed in words but little in reality, a zone that is familiar and mythological at the same time. The opposite of the known—its reverse side—are those streets to me, almost as completely hidden as the buried foundation of our house or our invisible skeleton. My walk brought me to a corner. I breathed the night, in peaceful respite from thought. The vision before me, in no way complicated, in any case seemed simplified by my fatigue. It was so typical that it seemed unreal. It was a street of low houses, and although the first impression was poverty, the second was undoubtedly joyous. The street was both very poor and very lovely. No house stood out on the street; a fig tree cast a shadow over a corner wall; the street doors—higher than the lines extending along the walls—seemed made of the same infinite substance as the night. The sidewalk sloped up the street, a street of elemental clay, the clay of a still unconquered America. Farther away, the narrow street dwindled into the pampa, toward Maldonado. Over the muddy, chaotic earth a red pink wall seemed not to harbor moonglow but to shed a light of its own. There is probably no better way to name tenderness than that red pink.

I stood looking at that simple scene. I thought, no doubt aloud: “This is the same as it was thirty years ago….” I guessed at the date: a recent time in other countries, but already remote in this changing part of the world. Perhaps a bird was singing and I felt for him a small, bird-size affection; but most probably the only noise in this vertiginous silence was the equally timeless sound of the crickets. The easy thought I am somewhere in the 1800s ceased to be a few careless words and became profoundly real. I felt dead, I felt I was an abstract perceiver of the world, struck by an undefined fear imbued with science, or the supreme clarity of metaphysics. No, I did not believe I had traversed the presumed waters of Time; rather I suspected that I possessed the reticent or absent meaning of the inconceivable word eternity. Only later was I able to define these imaginings.

Now I shall transcribe it thus: that pure representation of homogeneous facts—- calm night, limpid wall, rural scent of honeysuckle, elemental clay—is not merely identical to the scene on that corner so many years ago; it is, without similarities or repetitions, the same. If we can intuit that sameness, time is a delusion: the impartiality and inseparability of one moment of time’s apparent yesterday and another of time’s apparent today are enough to make it disintegrate.

It is evident that the number of these human moments is not infinite. The basic elemental moments are even more impersonal—physical suffering and physical pleasure, the approach of sleep, listening to a single piece of music, moments of great intensity or great dejection. I have reached, in advance, the following conclusion: life is too impoverished not to be also immortal. But we do not even possess the certainty of our poverty, inasmuch as time, easily denied by the senses, is not so easily denied by the intellect, from whose essence the concept of succession seems inseparable. So then, let my glimpse of an idea remain as an emotional anecdote; let the real moment of ecstasy and the possible insinuation of eternity which that night lavished on me, remain confined to this sheet of paper, openly unresolved.

Tuesday 09.17.13
Posted by Cody Trepte
 
Newer / Older